男子啦啦队！！

暂无简介

南方边陲小镇，绰号“钉子李”的老人自恃棋艺高超，他将老将钉在棋盘上，声称无人能令他拔钉挪将，独孤求败。在那个特殊的时代，百万青年上山下乡。小镇新来的书记（牛犇饰）输棋后愤愤不平，派下属去城里寻找擅长琴棋书画的人才。外号“棋呆子”的北京青年王一生（谢园饰）稀里糊涂成了破坏文化大革命的现行反革命，最后被寻找他的人救了出去。他似乎对所要去的地方根本没任何想法，只要有饭有棋就一切都好。“何以解忧，惟有下棋。”呆子一心只在棋局，他将在那个陌生的所在和各路高手留下令人神往的对决……本片根据阿城的同名小说改编，并荣获1989年度金鸡奖最佳男演员奖（谢园）。

二战前夕一个狂野的探险家在非洲乞力马扎罗山附近寻找失落的钻石矿 纳粹也正在寻找钻石矿准备为希特勒的野心计划计划提供强大的资金。

雨夜，华盛公司保险柜被撬。几天后公司要员林森携重要文件在一起蓄意车祸中失踪。晚报记者沈丹丹拍下车祸照片。刑警队长罗浩将某公司经理刘威龙列为重要嫌疑对象。一天两个青年潜入沈丹丹宿舍，欲偷窃罪证照片，被罗浩和沈丹丹吓走。原来，签合同上当的刘威龙铤而走险绑架了林森。罗、沈二人赶到藏匿林森的仓库，差点被狡猾的刘威龙炸死。罗浩紧追刘威龙，两人在海边展开搏斗。众刑警赶到将刘威龙抓获。沈丹丹和罗浩两人逐渐擦出了爱的火花

　　电影剧情：
　　少女张碧玉十七岁，生于小康之家，生活无忧无缺。张父忙于赚钱，张母则沉迷打麻雀，小弟年纪又小，碧玉心事无人可诉，苦闷非常。碧玉看见学校里许多同学都一双一对，羡慕不已。
　　虽然也有一两个同学追求她，但她的一颗芳心却落在李晚成老师身上。碧玉不但借辞请老师补课，还请他老师参加音乐会。她得不到父母的关心，暗恋李老师又遭拒绝。遂贸然接受花花公子何少青的追求，险告失身。碧玉羞愤自杀，幸获救，并获双亲、师长谅解，重过新生活。
　　外文名：Sweet seventeen
　　出品时间：1954年
　　出品公司：自由影业公司
　　发行公司：自由影业公司
　　摄制公司：华达片场
　　制片地区：中国香港
　　类    型：剧情
　　片    长：108分钟
　　上映时间：1954年07月16日
　　对白语言：国语
　　色    彩：黑白
　　职员表：
　　监制：黄卓汉；袁德甫
　　导演：秦剑
　　编剧：莫康时
　　摄影：王剑寒
　　剪辑：潘照；梁恭
　　灯光：梁炳
　　录音：谭宏远
　　剧务：陈英杰
　　场记：赵伯川
　　布景师：包天鸣
　　制片：潘炳权
　　音乐：叶纯之
　　场务：王海涛
　　化妆：方圆
　　洗印：樊家根
　　演员表：
　　角色                         演员                          备注
　　张碧玉                        林翠----
　　李晚成黄河----
　　张伯年石磊----
　　王妈马笑侬----
　　张少帆水维德----
　　张太太裘萍----
　　朱医生吴景平----
　　罗校长陈濠----
　　方志雄杨文凯----
　　霍锦江陈榴霞                          ----
　　何美萍童真----
　　小萧马力----
　　何少青岳麟----
　　陈汉杨帆----
　　蔡淑兰杨雯----
　　江小珠丹妮----
　　黄云左青----
　　方萍伊玲----

　　Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'
　　By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.
　　Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.
　　One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.
　　While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.
　　Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...