347
6.2

土忍记:风之天狗

导演:
Keiichi Ozawa
主演:
高桥英树,和泉雅子,夏八木勋,Seiichirô Kameishi,深江章喜,Yuji Kodaka,乡英治,Masaya Oka,Utako Shibusawa,Maya Kitajima
别名:
未知
6.2
347人评分
日语
语言
1970
上映时间
83
片长
简介:
  六平太是一名残暴的柳生忍者一族执行者。在他目睹其妹因其行为而自杀后,六平太的人生迎来了一个新的转折。。。
猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
105
10.0
已完结
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
10.0
更新时间:2025年09月06日
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
8000
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
教宗的承继
24
0.0
已完结
教宗的承继
0.0
更新时间:2025年09月06日
主演:安东尼·霍普金斯,乔纳森·普雷斯,胡安·米努欣,路易斯·尼科,克里斯蒂娜·巴尼加斯,玛丽亚·乌斯多,雷纳托·斯卡帕,西德尼·科尔,阿基里·布鲁尼尼,费德里科·托瑞,赫尔曼·德·席尔瓦,利桑德罗·菲克斯,利贝罗·德·瑞恩佐,威利·乔纳,索非亚·塞萨克,文森特·里奥特,塞奇莉亚·达齐,塞尔吉奥·尼古拉,洛伦佐·维格万诺,教皇本尼迪克特十六世,方济各
简介:这是一个真实的故事,讲述了近 2000 年来最戏剧性的权力交接事件之一。主教贝尔格利奥(乔纳森·普雷斯饰演)对教会的发展方向感到十分失望,因此向教皇本笃(安东尼·霍普金斯饰演)申请在 2012 年退休。然而,面对丑闻和自我怀疑,善于内省的教皇本笃召见对他最严厉的批判者和未来的继任者来到罗马,在梵蒂冈的围墙之内,展开了一场传统与进步、罪恶与宽恕之间的斗争,这两位截然不同的人直面各自的过去,以图寻找共同点,以及为全世界十亿信徒开创未来。
0
2019
教宗的承继
主演:安东尼·霍普金斯,乔纳森·普雷斯,胡安·米努欣,路易斯·尼科,克里斯蒂娜·巴尼加斯,玛丽亚·乌斯多,雷纳托·斯卡帕,西德尼·科尔,阿基里·布鲁尼尼,费德里科·托瑞,赫尔曼·德·席尔瓦,利桑德罗·菲克斯,利贝罗·德·瑞恩佐,威利·乔纳,索非亚·塞萨克,文森特·里奥特,塞奇莉亚·达齐,塞尔吉奥·尼古拉,洛伦佐·维格万诺,教皇本尼迪克特十六世,方济各
等待方舟
425
7.0
HD中字
等待方舟
7.0
更新时间:2025年12月19日
主演:耶日·斯图尔,克里斯提娜·杨达,卡里娜·谢鲁斯克,马里乌什·德莫霍夫斯基,马雷克·瓦尔切夫斯基,扬·诺维茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,莱昂·涅姆奇克,克兹佐夫·马扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加尔
简介:Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.  Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory  n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.  What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.  On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.  One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.  Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.
2492
1985
等待方舟
主演:耶日·斯图尔,克里斯提娜·杨达,卡里娜·谢鲁斯克,马里乌什·德莫霍夫斯基,马雷克·瓦尔切夫斯基,扬·诺维茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,莱昂·涅姆奇克,克兹佐夫·马扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加尔
儿子离家时
97
2.0
HD中字
儿子离家时
2.0
更新时间:2025年09月08日
主演:西西莉·泰森,保罗·温菲尔德,凯文·霍克斯,卡门马修斯
简介:

  这是一个讲述亲情和奋斗的故事,窘困的父亲为了养活家人而被迫偷盗,导致自尊心极强的儿子离家出走。影片对家庭关系,贫富分化都有细致的描述。电影是由 William H. Armstrong的同名小说改编拍摄而成,讲述了30年代一个美国黑人家庭的种种经历。故事则是关于一个男孩的信念、努力和坚毅的决心,主角是美国一个黑人佃农家庭的11岁少年.当时是一个经济萧条的年代,这个家庭的生计也面临艰难的考验,只有忠心的义犬 Sounder 依然守在一家人的身旁。佃农父亲为了让一家人能够维持温饱,不得已之下偷了别人的食物,但还是被人发现并因此遭到法律制裁,被送到劳动集中营服刑。少年为了探望父亲,就和 Sounder展开一场长途跋涉的漫长旅程,在这段旅程当中,少年经历了许多前所未有的体验,尤其还遇到一位热心助人的老师教他阅读,少年就在种种历练中不断蜕变成长,即使面对逆境,依然对未来生活怀抱着无限的理想与希望。2003年迪斯尼重拍了这部经典影片。
  The Morgans, a loving and strong family of Black sharecroppers in Louisiana in 1933, face a serious family crisis when the husband and father, Nathan Lee Morgan, is convicted of a petty crime and sent to a prison camp. After some weeks or months, the wife and mother, Rebecca Morgan, sends the oldest son, who is about 11 years old, to visit his father at the camp. The trip becomes something of an odyssey for the boy. During the journey he stays a little while with a dedicated Black schoolteacher.
  获奖记录
  《Sounder》1973年得到奥斯卡最佳影片、最佳男女主角和最佳改编剧本的提名。在2006年美国电影学院百年百部励志电影中名列第六十一位。

358
1972
儿子离家时
主演:西西莉·泰森,保罗·温菲尔德,凯文·霍克斯,卡门马修斯
APP下载提示
请下载APP,享受更流畅的体验! 立即下载