证据

　　A year after her murder, the police re-open the case of Yvonne Harrison when they receive an anonymous letter implicating a burglar, Harry Repp, who is about to be released from prison. Supt. Strange assigns the case to DS Lewis, who is chafing at the bit awaiting his promotion to Inspector. Morse has been ill and has only just returned to work. He steps on Lewis' toes by involving himself in the case, but as the body count rises, Morse finds himself in charge of investigating a woman who had many affairs with many different men. When he learns that the dead men were in possession of large amount of cash, he suspects they were blackmailing her murderer.

　　Rachel James is shot through her kitchen window while having breakfast early one morning. She was having an affair with Dr. Julian Storrs, an Oxford professor who is a candidate for Master of Lonsdale College. When her next door neighbor is also killed however, Morse determines that the shooting of James may have been in error. Morse also suspects that he may have been a blackmailer. Both Storrs an his rival for the Masters position, Denis Cornford had secrets that would make them suspects. Morse determines that several others also had things to hide and any one of them could have committed the murders.

　　Morse is taken seriously ill at a museum reception and is hospitalized. In the hospital, Supt. Strange, visits Morse to push him to take early retirement, while Dr. Millicent 'Millie' Van Buren gives him her book on a 140 year-old court case known as the Oxford Canal Murders. The case involved the murder and rape of a young woman, Mrs Joanna Franks, traveling by canal boat from Coventry to London. The case resulted in three boatmen being sentenced to death and two of them hanged. Morse starts to read Millie's book and dreams about it. He soon has a number of problems with the case.
　　Why weren't the three men also charged with theft? Why did Mrs Franks take a boat instead of a train that was much faster and comfortable and only slightly more expensive? Why didn't she abandon the boat after she complained about lewd behavior of the crew at the shipping office in Banbury? Why did she then drink and 'socialise' with the crew? What happened to her 'carpet bag' with which she arrived on the boat but which was not mentioned in the court case, nor was it stored in the archives with her, almost empty, trunk? The trunk was marked with initials of her first husband who had died. How did it happen that her shoes were found on the boat but nobody saw her return to the boat from the forest?
　　PC Adrian Kershaw does some brilliant leg work for Morse. He studied history and has invaluable background knowledge. For instance, he mentions that the boatmen had bad reputation because they worked on Sundays and did not attend church. Later a chapel was built for them in Oxford.
　　The dead woman's clothes and the shoes found on the boat are submitted to modern forensic investigation. The result is that the shoes did not belong to the dead woman found in the water because she was much taller.The shoes were never used in the forest.
　　Only Mrs Franks' husband, Charles Franks, was called to identify the body of the dead woman. He claimed that, while her face was darkened and disfigured, he found a birth mark behind her ear. The prosecutor welcomed that information "that only a husband or a lover would know". The accused were not shown the body. The defense attorney merely claimed that the guilt of the three men was not proved. All three accused claimed to the end that they were innocent. One of them was not executed because he embraced Christianity in prison.
　　Morse instructs Kershaw to investigate if Charles Franks benefited from his wife's death and, indeed, he pocketed 300 pounds insurance money. Case closed: Charles Franks murdered a tall women and dropped her in the canal after meeting Joanna in the forest. If Joanna Franks jumped off the boat at the same time as the dead body hit the water, she swam to the bank and joined her husband. The couple changed their names, in the case of 'Charles Franks' a second time after he 'died' as Joanna's first husband. The fourth boatman, a youngster who was not charged, was probably paid by Joanna to give false testimony.
　　Morse travels to Ireland and has a grave of Joanna's first husband exhumed. The coffin contains bags of sand and some stones.

　　莱安农·刘易斯 (Rhiannon Lewis) 并不令人印象深刻，也很难脱颖而出。她走在街上时，人们不会注意到她。她在工作中升职时总是被忽视，她喜欢的那个男人有承诺问题，她的父亲病得很重。突然间，当她失去控制并变成一个全新的人时，她生活中的一切都发生了巨大变化——一个有信心做任何事情的人。当她拥抱一个新的强大角色时，她的生活永远改变了，但她能保守自己的秘密吗？
　　该剧改编自 C.J.斯库斯 2017 年的同名邪典小说

　　夏明翰年轻时领导的革命团体“沙子会”在当地很有影响。面对吴佩孚的招安，他不屑一顾；在查禁日货的斗争中，他大义灭亲。这些举动引来富绅们的强烈不满。夏明翰的爷爷为保他安全，将他深锁阁楼。夏明翰趁夜破窗逃走，从此与家庭决裂。到长沙后，夏明翰经毛泽东介绍加入共产党。在领导人力车工人罢工时，交通员郑家钧为掩护他，右臂中弹受伤。两人在接触中日久生情，经毛泽东提议，结为夫妇。1928年，夏明翰被党调至湖北工作。此时，白色恐怖愈演愈烈，国民党几次抓捕夏明翰未果。夏明翰与中央派来的李维汉商议决定取消暴动计划，却在准备转移时不幸被内奸出卖。英勇就义前，夏明翰留下了爱国诗：“砍头不要紧，只要主义真。杀了夏明翰，还有后来人”。

　　讲述来民国初年，在风云际会的上海滩，一个平凡的小警察邢佳栋饰演的陆行天被推到来时代的风口浪尖，继而发生的种种感情、革命、斗争故事。该剧有个特别之处就是引进了一个全新的行当-翻戏党，导演谭友业表示，该剧故事将镜头对准纵横江湖数百年传奇行当雁门，民国时期又名“翻戏党”，“这一门算是江湖中上的地下党，专以诈术、设局骗取金银财宝，他们这些人是江湖几大门最有智商和谋略，专干大买卖。”

　　《刷新3+7》由10个独立的故事组成。刷新：告别过去重新开始。3，过去现在未来3种时态；7，7种颜色，多彩的生命。
　　10个故事分别为：
　　《说好我们的店》
　　
　　《城市之光》
　　
　　《小城故事多》
　　
　　《喜宴》
　　
　　《六月的雨》
　　
　　《墙里墙外》
　　
　　《我的居委会大妈》
　　
　　《彩色星期五》
　　
　　《兵马俑与招财猫》
　　《艺术家》

　　该剧以刘集支部保存的我国现存最早中文译本《共产党宣言》为主题，是东营市实施的一项重点文化工程，是一部向中国共产党90华诞纪念而创作的主旋律献礼剧。

 孟波(连伟健)受黑帮长老之托，保护其女，引致好友被杀，但波仍继续向黑帮挑战，并以热诚感化江湖中人改邪归正，可是危机四伏，波终被国际恐怖杀手组织追杀。这二十集新派动作剧，分四个有连贯性之故事，主要环绕这位终日周旋于美女群中的侦探孟波，全剧轻松惹笑，故事紧凑剌激，是观众必然选择.

 皇帝還是如往常一樣不上朝，龍椅上不見龍顏，文武百官只能望龍椅遙拜，朝中大事就由崔丞相和秦公公代行視事。二皇爺感嘆皇帝終日在深宮沈浸酒色，不理朝政，坐視佞臣把持政務。 皇帝在後宮夜夜笙歌，沈湎於酒池肉林中，白蓮教主顧允成一心推翻昏君，派出得力弟子錢一本和女兒顧芙蓉行刺狗皇帝。 兩人蒙面夜闖寢宮行刺昏庸無能的皇帝，夜裡傳來皇帝的驚叫…大事不好，出事啦～ 秦公公、崔丞相偷讀皇上如有不虞時的遺詔，竟指名要皇上寵幸的愛妃鄭貴妃、苗貴妃、及近臣秦公公、崔丞相、劉大學士與張校尉陪葬，劉大學士與張校尉皆為文武忠臣，自然願意慷慨隨伴皇上共赴黃泉。但貪生怕死的皇后，與一直戀棧權位的大太監秦公公、大貪官崔丞相哪肯陪葬，三人商量出一個權宜之計，就是到民間找一個長相跟皇上相似的人進宮，假扮皇上。此舉一來他們可免除陪葬厄運，二來又可「挾天子以令諸侯」，控制假皇帝！ 皇宮高牆內有個皇帝躺在冰冷的地下室昏迷著，高牆外的市集內卻有個長的和皇帝一模一樣的人在活蹦亂跳著。他是何天養，一樣的臉孔，卻有著天壤之別的人生。 究竟乞丐何天養與皇帝有何關係？在他認識了窮書生李尚文和賣身葬父的江湖女子顏小栗後，會如何展開他們一連串前所未有的冒險旅程…